Bug#869095: RFS: pybind11/2.1.0-4 [RC]
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 16:13 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:31:34AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> > > 2017-07-24 1:23 GMT+01:00 Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>:
> > > > On debdiff:
> > > > Files in second .deb but not in first
> > > > -------------------------------------
> > > > -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/pybind11-doc/
> > > > html/_sources/advanced/cast/chrono.rst.txt
> > > > -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/pybind11-doc/
> > > > html/_sources/advanced/cast/custom.rst.txt
> > > > [many more]
> > > >
> > > > Files in first .deb but not in second
> > > > -------------------------------------
> > > > -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/pybind11-doc/
> > > > html/_sources/advanced/cast/chrono.txt
> > > > -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/pybind11-doc/
> > > > html/_sources/advanced/cast/custom.txt
> > > >
> > > > I guess you don't want .rst.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > This has to do with the change of behavior between Sphinx 1.4.x
> > > (Stretch)
> > > and 1.5.x (Buster).
> > >
> > > Same thing has happened with other packages uploaded recently, such
> > > as
> > > python-latexcodec.
> >
> >
> > I guess it needs to be fixed somewhere, then. Could you tell us when
> > you'll
> > have an updated package, or sphinx itself is fixed?
>
> I don't understand what needs to be fixed. Sphinx changed the way they
> generate the documentation, so what?
Looks like the files are bit-for-bit identical, the new version merely has
double extension which is not nice, but not a show stopper.
> Should there be a problem, then it should probably be fixed in Sphinx.
> This package, as many others I maintain, uses a fairly standard Sphinx
> configuration.
Should I then go ahead with the upload?
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ A master species delegates.
Reply to: