[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#860496: marked as done (RFS: drgeo/1.1.0-10.3 [NMU, RC])



Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:11:35 -0700
with message-id <20170717181135.4ohj7ekiiil2qbrf@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive RFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #860496,
regarding RFS: drgeo/1.1.0-10.3 [NMU, RC]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
860496: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860496
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drgeo"

 * Package name    : drgeo
   Version         : 1.1.0-10.3
   Upstream Author : https://mentors.debian.net/package/drgeo
 * URL             : http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Dr._geo
 * License         : GPLv2 or later
   Section         : math

  It builds this binary packages:

    drgeo - interactive geometry software

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/drgeo


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drgeo/drgeo_1.1.0-10.3.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Fixed compatibility with Guile 2.0. (Closes: #707903)

--
Sincerely,
Patrick Hetu

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing inactive RFS.  Please feel free to re-open if you have an
updated source package.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: