[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#864622: RFS: rich-minority/1.0.1-1 [ITP]



Hi Sean,

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 06:42:28PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello Nicholas,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:33:12PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Would it be better to ship README.org and file a bug against the
> > package myself?
> 
> Yes.  Why not ship README.org in the interim?

Let's discuss .org documentation at DebConf.  I've converted the
README to plaintext for now.

> > How many lines can I dedicate to this?  By my count I need to
> > summarise the following in five lines, and the most salient additions
> > are the mention of diminish.el, plus compare/contrast by adding what I
> > suspect are the two most salient points.
> >   * "/missing/...quick and simple replacement functionality"
> >   * the addition of "It accepts *regexps* instead of [individual specifications]".
> 
> Where are you getting this line limit from?

In the same way that lines must be hard-wrapped to fit a 80 column
terminal I inferred that long description should also fit in a 24 line
terminal, and that README should used for anything longer.  Maybe it's
not a hard rule, but this has always struck me as a sort of standard.
At any rate, I've updated the description.

> > These two points seem contradictory to me.  Do you know how
> > diminish.el is more quick and simple?  Also, can I use your answer for
> > a patch against the upstream description, because I might not be the
> > only one who's not confused about this.  Failing that, I can open an
> > upstream issue/request for clarified description.
> 
> diminish.el works like this:
> 
>     (diminish 'auto-fill-function)
> 
> That's it.  Clearly simpler.

I think this is probably the simplest rich-minority-mode equivalent,
assuming that subsequent (diminish 'minor-mode-function) adds items
to-be-hidden:

(push " Fill" rm-blacklist)

I haven't investigated corner cases, but it would seem that
rich-minority-mode might also be simple :-)

All of your comments should be addressed by 419b8ca which I believe is
ready to upload.  I would be very appreciative if you would also grand
DM permissions for it :-)

Thank you,
Nicholas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: