Bug#883839: RFS: terminal.app/0.9.9-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "terminal.app"
* Package name : terminal.app
Version : 0.9.9-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Malmberg <alexander@malmberg.org> and others
* URL : http://gap.nongnu.org/terminal/
* License : GPL-2
Section : gnustep
It builds this binary package:
terminal.app - Terminal Emulator for GNUstep
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/terminal.app
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminal.app/terminal.app_0.9.9-1.dsc
Or clone the Git repository:
git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-gnustep/terminal.app.git
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release (identical to 0.9.8.1 which was actually a
snapshot of SVN trunk and not a proper release).
* debian/patches/FTBFS-kFreeBSD: Refresh and fix yet another FTBFS on
GNU/kFreeBSD.
* debian/patches/fix-int-to-pointer-cast.patch: New (Closes: #749796).
* debian/patches/check-write-return-value.patch: New, check the return
value of `write'; fixes a compiler warning.
* debian/patches/series: Update.
* debian/compat: Bump compat level to 10.
* debian/control (Build-Depends): Bump debhelper requirement to >= 10.
Remove imagemagick and dpkg-dev; no longer needed. Require
gnustep-make >= 2.7.0-3 for recent config.mk.
(Vcs-Git, Vcs-Browser): Use secure/canonical URIs.
(Standards-Version): Claim compliance with 4.1.2 as of this release.
* debian/menu:
* debian/clean: Delete.
* debian/install: Don't install the .xpm icon.
* debian/preinst:
* debian/postinst:
* debian/prerm: Delete maintainer scripts; no longer needed.
* debian/rules: Rewrite for modern dh.
* debian/changelog: Whitespace cleanup.
* debian/watch: Upgrade to version 4; use secure URI.
* debian/Terminal.desktop: Add Keywords field.
* debian/copyright: Update copyright years and Gürkan's name. Use https
for the Format field.
P.S. The package doesn't pass the piuparts test because of #832349 but
the instance at piuparts.d.o runs with --warn-on-others so that's
not a problem.
Reply to: