[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#862930: RFS: node-big-integer/1.6.22-1 [ITP]



Does node-bn does the same ?

Thanks

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >I'm not sure what you mean.
>> >These are dev dependencies, they are used by big-integer developers to
>> >perform various development tasks, but they are not required to simply
>> >use the library so there is no point in packaging them in Debian.
>> >And they are *not* embedded in the package, they only appear in
>> >package.json.
>>
>>
>> this makes sense, thanks.
>> So the review goes to the next step.
>> 1) licenses are missing (even if not used in the binary package, the copyright
>> should list all the licenses in the source code).
>> 2) please use the same copyright as upstream for Debian packaging, this will make
>> patch upstreaming possible without having to explicitly relicense them
>
> ping
>
> G.
>>
>> G.
>>
>>
>


Reply to: