Hi, On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:20:03PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 06:42:28PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Hello Nicholas, > > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 07:33:12PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > > Would it be better to ship README.org and file a bug against the > > > package myself? > > > > Yes. Why not ship README.org in the interim? > > Let's discuss .org documentation at DebConf. I've converted the > README to plaintext for now. At DebConf consensus was reached that emacs users prefer READMEs as org files ;-) Commit 393e81b and the package on mentors now reflects this. > > > These two points seem contradictory to me. Do you know how > > > diminish.el is more quick and simple? Also, can I use your answer for > > > a patch against the upstream description, because I might not be the > > > only one who's not confused about this. Failing that, I can open an > > > upstream issue/request for clarified description. > > > > diminish.el works like this: > > > > (diminish 'auto-fill-function) > > > > That's it. Clearly simpler. > > I think this is probably the simplest rich-minority-mode equivalent, > assuming that subsequent (diminish 'minor-mode-function) adds items > to-be-hidden: > > (push " Fill" rm-blacklist) > > I haven't investigated corner cases, but it would seem that > rich-minority-mode might also be simple :-) Would you like me to add this to the documentation? Of course I'll also submit a patch upstream. Also, please let me know if you're currently too busy to sponsor this one. I can find an off-team sponsor if necessary. Cheers, Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature