[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/1.0.0-3 [ITP #864358]

On 07/25/2017 11:05 PM, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
Hi Roland,

Thank you very much for your reply.

> Some further problems with the packaging:
> - The link /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbitfield.so should go to the
>   libbitfield-dev package.
> - A shared library should have a debian/<package.>.symbols file
>   (see man dpkg-gensymbols).
> - The standards version should be updated to 4.0.0
> - The files README.{Debian,source} do not provide any real info. They should 
>   be dropped until they contain something useful.
> - Please also remove the unrelated comments at the end of debian/rules and
>   the comments after the DH_VERBOSE line at the beginning.
> - The files debian/*.dirs are unnecessary . Please remove.
> Please fix your package and ping me when done, so I can recheck.

Fixed. Please, recheck.

  dget -x

Best regards,

Vitalie Ciubotaru

Reply to: