[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#867819: marked as done (RFS: smplayer-themes/1:17.3.0-1)

Your message dated Mon, 10 Jul 2017 06:53:26 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1098134058.2746056.1499669606032@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#867819: RFS: smplayer-themes/1:17.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #867819,
regarding RFS: smplayer-themes/1:17.3.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

867819: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smplayer-themes"

 * Package name    : smplayer-themes
   Version         : 1:17.3.0-1
   Upstream Author : Ricardo Villalba <rvm@users.sourceforge.net>
 * URL             : http://smplayer.sourceforge.net/en/downloads
 * License         : GPL-2+
   Section         : video

  It builds those binary packages:

    smplayer-themes - complete front-end for MPlayer - icon themes

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smplayer-themes/smplayer-themes_17.3.0-1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Upload to unstable.
  * Update debian/copyright.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 4.0.0. (no changes needed)

   Mateusz Łukasik

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smplayer-themes"



--- End Message ---

Reply to: