Re: experimental => unstable?

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: experimental => unstable?
From: Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 08:46:32 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 87tw3d6bef.fsf@deep-thought.43-1.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAEQ9gEmVfn-UOm1R=OgDRtnoE+AhOdPGJKK8EomPhycEJba5YQ@mail.gmail.com> (Roger Shimizu's message of "Sun, 18 Jun 2017 15:41:45 +0900")
References: <[🔎] CAEQ9gEmVfn-UOm1R=OgDRtnoE+AhOdPGJKK8EomPhycEJba5YQ@mail.gmail.com>

Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> writes:
> Stretch is just released [0], Yeah~~~~~!
> We're having a release party in Tokyo [1].

Yay \o/

> [0] https://www.debian.org/News/2017/20170617
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleasePartyStretch/Japan/Tokyo
>
> So it should be fine to release various packages currently being held
> in experimental to unstable.
> Right?

Yes, it's fine to upload packages to unstable again.  Just remember to
coordinate transitions with the release team beforehand (if your package
would start a transition).

Ansgar

Reply to:

References:
- experimental => unstable?
  - From: Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: experimental => unstable?
Next by Date: Re: experimental => unstable?
Previous by thread: experimental => unstable?
Next by thread: Re: experimental => unstable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread