Re: Problem backporting libhmsbeagle
Even if these code lines would work they probably should be reformulated by upstream so they are easier to read:
++i assigns I the value I+1 and returns the new i. And then i is assigned another new value by the i= in the same line...
...a better way to express what I believe the line should mean would be:
++i;
i &= 3;
Perhaps the c compiler is as unsure which assignment should have the precedence as I am.
Kind regards,
Gunter.
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Reply to: