[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#862749: marked as done (RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.7.0-1)



Your message dated Sat, 17 Jun 2017 04:25:14 +0000
with message-id <E1dM5IQ-0001mU-LJ@quantz.debian.org>
and subject line closing RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.7.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #862749,
regarding RFS: python-mechanicalsoup/0.7.0-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
862749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862749
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:

* Package name    : python-mechanicalsoup
  Version         : 0.7.0
  Upstream Author : Mirth Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://github.com/hickford/MechanicalSoup
* License         : Expat
  Section         : python

One can check out the package by visiting the following URL:

  https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-mechanicalsoup.git

Changes since last upload:

  * Swith from git-dpm to gbp
    - Drop git-dpm configuration
    - Add gbp configuration
  * Fix typo in watch regex
  * Fixup Vcs-Browser URI
  * New upstream version 0.7.0
  * Bump minimum Py3 version to 3.3
  * Exclude egg-info directory via extend-diff-ignore
  * Add DEP-8 tests, drop superfluous Testsuite field

Best regards,
Ghis

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package python-mechanicalsoup version 0.7.0-1 is in unstable now.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/python-mechanicalsoup

--- End Message ---

Reply to: