[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#864271: marked as done (RFS: protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU])



Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:37:53 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <7223176.5780908.1496774273548@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#864271: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#864271: RFS: protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #864271,
regarding RFS: protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
864271: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Tags: morinfo
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-protobuf-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Clarification-moreinfo:
  this tag is for protbuf maintainers to approve this NMU.

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "protobuf"

 * Package name    : protobuf
   Version         : 3.3.1-0.1
   Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
 * URL             : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
 * License         : [fill in]
   Section         : devel

  It builds those binary packages:

    libprotobuf-dev - protocol buffers C++ library (development files)
 libprotobuf-java - Java bindings for protocol buffers
 libprotobuf-lite13 - protocol buffers C++ library (lite version)
 libprotobuf13 - protocol buffers C++ library
 libprotoc-dev - protocol buffers compiler library (development files)
 libprotoc13 - protocol buffers compiler library
 protobuf-compiler - compiler for protocol buffer definition files
 python-protobuf - Python bindings for protocol buffers
 python3-protobuf - Python 3 bindings for protocol buffers

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/protobuf

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/debomatic/experimental/pool/protobuf_3.3.1-0.1/protobuf_3.3.1-0.1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from

http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/protobuf/3.3.1-0.1/buildlog

  Changes since the last upload:

protobuf (3.3.1-0.1) experimental; urgency=medium

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * New upstream release.
  * Replace Build-Deps google-mock and libgtest-dev with googletest.
    Both google-mock and libgtest-dev are stub packages now.
    + Update gmock and gtest source path in rules.
  * Remove patches included in upstream code:
    - Restore-New-Callback-into-google-protobuf-namespace.patch
    - expect_death.patch
    - java-test-scope.patch
    - python3_long_fix.patch
    - misleading-indentation.patch (Not merged but the bug is fixed)
  * Refresh remaining patches.
  * Bump ABI version to 13, renaming lib packages.

The package at mentors is not the latest, please use the debomatic dsc link.
The whole patchset for packaging update is attached.

Attachment: 3.0.0-9_to_3.3.1-0.1_patches.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

>This thread is indeed the start of contacting you, and such
>an RFS with "moreinfo" and "NMU" is safe from being uploaded

>accidentally.

well, tagging moreinfo via control@b.d.o doesn't trigger mails
to potential sponsors (usually, unless they subscribe to them too),
so better close it to really avoid them.
There is a protobuf-maintainers list, better to follow up there.

Thanks for your work, I hope maintainers will integrate something
and release a new version in experimental (I have some nasty protobuf
bugs I would like to know if fixed in the new release!)


G.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: