[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: TAG: durruter -- NAT/PAT routing helper



__________
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service
administrator should fix this.
El 28/05/17 a les 13:18, Andrew Shadura ha escrit:
> Control: retitle -1 RFP: durruter -- NAT/PAT routing helper
> 
> On 28/05/17 13:14, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>> On 27/05/17 22:24, Narcis Garcia wrote:
>>> Dear mentors,
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "durruter"
>>>
>>> Durruter is a command-line wizard to manage iptables entries like in a
>>> hardware router web interface. Forward ports and ranges from multiple
>>> interfaces, allow internet traffic from multiple nets to multiple
>>> network interfaces.
>>>
>>> Works with Debian GNU/Linux since 3.1 upto 9.0
>>>
>>> Complete information and personal sources & packages repository:
>>> https://www.actiu.net/durruter/
>>>
>>> Thanks for your consideration.
>>
>> I think you slightly misunderstood what the sponsorship is about. You're
>> supposed to present a near-ready source package you think is ready to be
>> uploaded to Debian unstable. Then your package goes through a review
>> process, you improve it if needed, and then the sponsor uploads it when
>> you both agree no further improvement is needed at the moment.
> 
> So far this doesn't look like a sponsorship request, but a request for
> packaging. I’m thus retitling the bug to match that.
> 
> Should you be interested in going through the process I have described
> above, change this bug into an ITP (Intent to Package), prepare the
> package and file another bug, a request for sponsorship (RFS) so that
> your packaging is reviewed and potentially uploaded.
> 

Thanks for fixing this; I read Debian wiki references but I still not
understand what's exactly the different task between a sponsor (TAG/ITP)
and a packager~uploader (RFP).
Who can I resquest now to re/package and upload to unstable repository?


Reply to: