Bug#862940: RFS: slick-greeter/1.0.3-1 ITP

["foss.freedom" <foss.freedom@gmail.com>]

Thanks Adam for the feedback.

unstable is therefore appropriate.

I have switched liblightdm-gobject-1-dev and liblightdm-gobject-dev
around in the latest upload. Hopefully this will resolve the first
alternate rule on buildds

cheers

David

On 24 May 2017 at 15:02, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:59:28AM +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
>>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "slick-greeter"
>>
>>   Changes since the last upload:
>>
>>    * Initial release. (Closes: #862934)
>
> Alas, it fails to build when build-dependencies are restricted to the first
> alternative listed, such as sbuild's default -- which is also used on
> official buildds.
>
> There's no package named liblightdm-gobject-1-dev anywhere in Debian -- you
> need to put liblightdm-gobject-dev first.
>
>> Please let me know if experimental is perhaps more appropriate than
>> unstable given the status of Stretch.
>
> For new packages, unstable is fine.  In fact, assuming you believe the
> package to be in a releasable shape, unstable is better as this way we won't
> have to migrate the package.
>
>
> Meow!
> --
> Don't be racist.  White, amber or black, all beers should be judged based
> solely on their merits.  Heck, even if occasionally a cider applies for a
> beer's job, why not?
> On the other hand, corpo lager is not a race.