At 2017-04-22T16:04:25-0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Can you explain your reasoning here? > > Currently, almost all Debian packagers/maintainers use one changelog > entry and version number per upload. So if there are rounds of review > in an RFS, new changes are folded into the previous changelog entry. > > My concern is simply that it could be misleading to break this > convention. Someone might think that there were -1, -2 and -3 uploads > to the archive. > > Jumping straight to -3 could also be confusing, so it would probably be > best to merge the changes in -3 and -2 into -1. > > The actual history of development is available from the git history, > which I will push to https://browse.dgit.debian.org/ as part of the > upload. So we're not throwing away any information. > > I guess that the older practice of using a new version number for each > round of review is due to the difficulties created by exchanging raw > source packages. But we are using git. > Okay. This makes sense. I'll coalesce the changelog and release history. Regards, Branden
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature