Bug#860415: RFS: python-xarray/0.9.2-1
Hi Ghis,
it looks like this package is under heavy development. 0.9.5 version
has just been released. Would you mind to package it instead of 0.9.2?
Best regards
Anton
2017-04-16 15:49 GMT+02:00 Ghislain Antony Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> * Package name : python-xarray
> Version : 0.8.2
> Upstream Author : xarray Developers
> * URL : http://xarray.pydata.org
> * License : Apache-2.0
> Section : python
>
> One can check out the package by visiting the following URL:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/python-xarray.git
>
> Changes since last upload:
>
> * New upstream version 0.9.2
> * Drop repacking of upstream tarballs, no longer required
> * Cherry-pick upstream fix for test config errors
> - New patch Fix-missing-config-errors-when-running-test-suite.patch
> * Add optional dependencies to the build
> - Added bottleneck, dask, distributed, h5netcdf, h5py, matplotlib,
> netcdf4, pydap, scipy, seaborn, toolz to the list of b-deps and
> suggested i-deps
> - Test without distributed and pydap since they are known to fail
> upstream
> * Run DEP-8 tests with all optional dependencies
> * Increase verbosity of DEP-8 tests
> * Discard egg-info dir using extend-diff-ignore
> * Add the documentation package
> - Add cartopy, ipython, numpydoc, sphinx, sphinx-rtd-theme to the list
> of b-deps
> - Mark the dask, matplotlib, netcdf4, numpy, pandas, scipy, seaborn
> b-deps as !nodoc
> - Do not build the documentation if the nodoc b-prof is requested
> * Use the packaged documentation
> - Add numpy-doc, pandas-doc, python3-doc to the list of b-deps
> - Patch the intersphinx configuration to use the packaged docs (new
> patch Use-packaged-docs.patch)
> * Use the packaged MathJax
> - Add MathJax to the i-deps of the documentation package
> - Patch the docs configuration to use the packaged MathJax
> * Remove privacy breaching content from the docs
> - New patch No-privacy-breach.patch
>
> Cheers,
> Ghis
>
Reply to: