On 2017-01-11 11:27+0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > While from technical point of view it looks good, I'm afraid there's a > license problem: you're mixing GPL-2 and GPL-3+. I believe this is not a > problem between symbol sets -- there's mere aggregation without derivation > or linking, but this can't be said for packaging. There's a discussion about the licensing there: https://github.com/Xaviju/inkscape-open-symbols/issues/61 I'm not sure about how inkscape-open-symbols could be licensed (for now it's GPL-2, so it's problematic, isn't it?)... Sure, it is a collection, but then, what would be the difference with the Debian package?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature