[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#848496: RFS: libopenshot/0.1.2+ds1-1 [ITP][experimental]



On 08/01/17 00:50, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
Hello Ghislain Vaillant,

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 04:22:03PM +0000, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libopenshot"
[...]

I looked at your package and it looks fine to me, but given you're
putting it under team maintenance (which is great!) shouldn't someone
from the team sponsor you?
They will likely also be able to review the package better then me.

I dropped an email to the list a while back but never got a reply. I also asked Gianfranco, but he prefers to prioritize on Stretch.

A personal recommendation would be to put the so version (9) in the
filename pattern of your debian/lib*9.install file so that whenever the
soname gets bumped you'll instantly notice it while building. Ofcourse
lintian will also complain about soname not matching package name, but
that's less subtle and you can't really have too many safeguards in
place to catch potential mistakes in package ABI handling.....

I never thought about this trick, this is very good advice indeed!

Would also be interesting to know what your interest in packaging this
library is. Do you have or intend to package something using this
library?

Basically, I want to roll-up libopenshot-audio, libopenshot and openshot-qt in experimental first, test the application (openshot-qt) there and release to unstable when ready.

Ghis


Reply to: