[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packaging question regarding the watch file



On Sunday, December 11, 2016 1:20:05 PM MST Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:16:21AM -0700, Herminio Hernandez Jr wrote:

> > Let me try to clarify. Did my package use the code from upstream or the

> > code from the watch file to build.

>

> Please read how gbp works.

> gbp uses the version from d/changelog to find the upstream tag which it

> then uses to recreate the orig tarball.

 

 

I have been reading the documentation here:http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.UPSTREAM.GIT.NOTARBALL

 

Just what I saw threw me off I am probably reading too much into it.

 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: