[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#839623: marked as done (RFS: Cutecom 0.30.3 update)



Your message dated Mon, 3 Oct 2016 21:39:45 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1718049.1961944.1475530785048@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Failure Notice
has caused the Debian Bug report #839623,
regarding RFS: Cutecom 0.30.3 update
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
839623: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839623
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a new sponsor for my package "cutecom":

* Package name    : cutecom
  Version         : 0.30.3-1
  Upstream Author : Alexander Neundorf <neundorf@kde.org>
* URL             : https://github.com/neundorf/CuteCom/
* License         : GPL-3+
  Section         : comm

It builds those binary packages:

  cutecom - Graphical serial terminal, like minicom
  cutecom-dbgsym - Debug symbols for cutecom

You can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x https://roman.khimov.ru/temp/deb-cutecom/cutecom_0.30.3-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release based on Qt5 (Closes: #788179, #696221)
   * Update license to GPLv3+, upstream changed to that in 2015
   * Update homepage, source and watch information (upstream
     development moved to github)
   * Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
   * Upgrade package to standards 3.9.8
   * Upgrade to debhelper 9
   * Drop "cutecom-0.22.0-nolinebreak.diff", obsolete
   * Drop "cutecom-remove-deprecated-desktop-entries.patch", obsolete
   * Drop "fix_pathes_for_debian.patch", obsolete
   * Remove obsolete menu support
   * Use Cmake RelWithDebInfo build type to get '-O2 -g' flags
   * Install desktop file (for 'System' category) system-wide (previously
     it was installed into kde directory) (Closes: #614793) (LP: #1575347)
   * Install an icon

-- 
 http://roman.khimov.ru
mailto: roman@khimov.ru
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
oops, sending again




Il Lunedì 3 Ottobre 2016 23:35, "MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com" <MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com> ha scritto:
Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.

<839623.done@bugs.debian.org>:
Remote host said:
550 Unknown or archived bug
[RCPT_TO]

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Received: from [212.82.98.53] by nm20.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2016 21:35:33 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.78] by tm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2016 21:35:33 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1015.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Oct 2016 21:35:33 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 580026.43611.bm@omp1015.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: SxOuv80VM1nrRkJE6ypSs7640SkZxHMbub126IT2x9VRY8zFHJ2.5kfCifzgoz4
RPc2IyOXWcaaPxdpPegnq_OnZqG.TNincWYna7B1ft0TZmFmDWYXnKUKD5Jasp4IHjRl9bpOBPLK
NjBYY46r4AAvzqnlwv6Sq1sR6pMtqZafWic.0PeVcRy2quQTwG4.CA05iSyX4HtRma277xagC9tv
PNdGrI.7asm3m6RM9ZMaqbWGV0q6b.pHok569d0TeWkPvIGYYyKdL1xaiuFXK6il9nQDruwhoeaN
WDYxNB2X3qldzlJEUOntEN_Zi1Vufj3rG7IPt1CDLOIiIhf_j8vbe76T5GD77Sirp0abbuV7aril
8jXfM_2V13kD3Ba4UTUpwK.xwOFHY_LGftHTYGl5iB.stQVe7vFQtyDFOu_MgAlUPjAQQtmJ4AWg
Iqdi82bL2E14cd_QqP33LtUwvxVlnjsLuEJni7mNWXIzEOqwbouFvoEZM.Aw2j3GaNwgxavXIC.K
xGUeu1Dgc4ieqcN2mmnmFHJGLCyhH_T5sbLJhdPPup3o-
Received: from jws700047.mail.ir2.yahoo.com by sendmailws108.mail.ir2.yahoo.com; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 21:35:33 +0000; 1475530533.190
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 21:35:29 +0000 (UTC)
From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
Reply-To: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
To: "roman@khimov.ru" <roman@khimov.ru>
Cc:  <839623.done@bugs.debian.org>
Message-ID: <1979514493.1957031.1475530529473@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1961532.LKqeS61ytt@masala.hex>
References: <[🔎] 2765059.igjqp3ajCp@masala.hex> <[🔎] 397826517.463757.1475486904540@mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 1961532.LKqeS61ytt@masala.hex>
Subject: Re: Bug#839623: RFS: Cutecom 0.30.3 update
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1783

Hi,

>Fixed.

>Added that.


ok
>Not exactly true, the license itself is still present in the repository, but 
>that's just a remnant from pre-0.30.x era, because all the code at the moment 
>uses GPLv3+.


wonderful, thanks for checking
>I think I'm following the CopyrightFormat [1] at the moment, it specifically 
>references standard Debian filesystem location for GPL licenses in examples. 
>I'm not even sure how to reduce GPL properly.


ok
look e.g. to example 3 and example 4
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
they have some little sentences and a link to the full license
(e.g. the "later" word is useful)

>Done.
>That was used for a long time and with original update attempt I've added 
>RelWithDebInfo to get proper "-O2 -g" flags, but looks like dh can do way more 
>these days, see below.


yes :)
>Done.


>I don't think I understand well the scope of this change, but it really worked 
>and now this thing builds correctly with just seven lines of `rules`. Really 
>cool. I've used `clean` file to get rid of one autogenerated file that didn't 
>allow easy second-time builds.


the scope is simplify Debian packaging ;)
there is a default rule that calls all the standard debian dh_*
and you can still override them in case of something special

>Not sure about that, the package might be used in some other environments and 
>I know that the versions specified should work correctly, so maybe it's better 

>to pass this information to whomever is going to use this debianization
ack

>done.

I sponsored it, thanks for converting the package, I hope you will also consider
it easier to maintain :)
(of course if you think it was better before... feel free to send another update :) )

thanks for your contribution to Debian!

G.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: