[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#829520: RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP



On 08/31, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

gbp:error: Can't determine upstream version from changelog

Mentors,

I am trying to convert my package using git. I am running into the lintian error

W: mbpfan source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.9.1-1

Based on what I read here: https://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number.html I tried to change the version to -0.1 in the changelog. Now I am getting this error

gbp:error: upstream/0 is not a valid treeish

If can point into the right direction I would appreciate it.

Thanks!

Herminio
Aug 31, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Herminio,
> >
> > [please CC the RFS so that your e-mail gets recorded and others can
> > provide feedback as well as me -- use reply-to-all]
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:23:09PM -0700, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> > > I have combined the patches using combinediff. I know you want me to
> > convert to
> > > git. Can you recommend good documentation to convert my package? Thanks!
> >
> > One easy way is to do this:
> >
> > apt-get install git-buildpackage
> > gbp import-dsc mbpfan_1.9.1-1.dsc
> >
> > --
> > Sean Whitton
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: