Re: Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]
Am Mittwoch, den 06.07.2016, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Tobias Frost:
> Some time ago a dh extension has Bern made for aspell dictinaries
> which should help. Take a look at aspell-it. (Im currently on the
> road so I cannot check if this also applies to this package and it
> was Quote long ago Ehen I worked aspell-it)
>
(Gosh, this was the result of Android autocorrection when directory is
not correctly set...)
So, I looked at it again. Seems so that aspell-sk could (and then also
should) use of dh_aspell-simple(1).
As said, the refrence package made at that time was aspell-it, so
taking a look at it will for sure help. See also #737515 and http://lis
ts.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/dict-common-dev/2014-June/000789.html)
--
tobi
>
> Am 6. Juli 2016 01:21:32 GMT+02:00, schrieb Adam Borowski <kilobyte@a
> ngband.pl>:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 02:28:30PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 05 July 2016 01:17:39 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > > Did you need to do any packaging changes to update S-V?
> > > > I wouldn't recommend updating S-V in an NMU.
> > >
> > > Well, Debian has in archives very old (maybe prehistoric) version
> > > of
> > > aspell-sk package. I reported this problem in bug 603719 in past
> > *six*
> > > years ago and everybody in Debian ignored it, current maintainer
> > > too.
> > >
> > > And now when I saw that aspell-sk package is going to be removed
> > > from
> >
> > > Debian, I updated compat level and thought that bringing new
> > > version
> > > should be done too...
> >
> > The package hasn't been updated since 2005, despite upstream being
> > alive.
> > I'd say it's hijack time (or, if you prefer a veneer of propriety,
> > orphaning
> > then adopting 20 minutes later).
> >
> > --
> > An imaginary friend squared is a real enemy.
>
Reply to: