Re: Bug#814852: RFS: openfst/1.5.1-1 -- weighted finite-state transducers library
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#814852: RFS: openfst/1.5.1-1 -- weighted finite-state transducers library
- From: Giulio Paci <giuliopaci@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:49:59 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 570E4E87.8060904@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <56E7E4F6.1080608@gmail.com>
- References: <20160227180424.GB3663@jwilk.net> <56D37285.5000901@gmail.com> <20160228232704.GA4135@jwilk.net> <56D43878.4060303@gmail.com> <20160229153729.GA6696@jwilk.net> <56D6A83A.4090002@gmail.com> <20160304201240.GA4123@jwilk.net> <56DDAFDC.6090807@gmail.com> <20160308180048.GA9498@jwilk.net> <56DF4323.3040102@gmail.com> <20160311153444.GA2548@jwilk.net> <56E7E4F6.1080608@gmail.com>
Hi Jakub,
upstream released a new version of openfst.
On 15/03/2016 11:33, Giulio Paci wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 16:34, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Giulio Paci <giuliopaci@gmail.com>, 2016-03-08, 22:24:
>>>> we do seem to have an s390x buildd with only 3GB of RAM:
>>>> https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=zemlinsky
>>>
>>> So we may have a failure there. :-/
>>
>> Perhaps. But with the current limits, the package would be built with -j1 there, so reducing parallelism further wouldn't help. Let's not worry about zemlinsky for now. :)
>>
>> Comments in src/extensions/python/*.cc say that the files were generated by Cython, but I don't see their Cython sources in the tarball. :-\
>
> You are right. I did not notice as I have disabled that extension (it is available also in pypi, so that one can be packaged if anybody is interested).
> I asked upstream and they agreed to release the .pyx file in the next openfst release.
>
> Essentially we are waiting:
> 1) .pyx file release;
This issue has been addressed.
> 2) openfst patch for Kaldi review.
This issue has not been addressed. As far as I know no progress at all has been made.
If you agree as this patch is a prerequisite for having Kaldi in Debian (which is one of my goals), I would include this patch without having it approved by upstream.
I am confident that they will approve it once they will find time to evaluate it, but I am not confident they will evaluate it very soon.
Bests,
Giulio
Reply to: