[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#820196: RFS: dante/1.4.1+dfsg-1 -- new upstream version, packaging updates



On 04/06/2016 11:47 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> And if I read your multiarch-find-lib right, it doesn't
>> appear to even handle shebang-interpreters at the moment?
> 
> Actually it handles shebang-interpreters [...]

Ok, sorry, I just skimmed the source and it didn't pop out to
me.

>> (Btw. I find it way easier to just set a SONAME for the preloaded
>> library and add a symbols file, plus also follow Debian package naming
>> conventions based on the soname, than to either ignore the lintian
>> warnings about missing SONAME or override them, which will become
>> necessary if the preloadable library resides directly in the canonical
>> /usr/lib/$triplet path directly.)
> 
> Yes, that's partly the reason why I didn't go that way - this would be
> another deviation from the Dante upstream source.

Btw. you could also try to upstream this. I imagine that even on
other distributions this might be interesting, because even if
you only have the "classical" /usr/lib vs. /usr/lib32 multilib,
as with other distros, this will probably still work. (Also,
it's not like adding a soname and renaming the file is something
terribly complicated. ;-))

So while this might be a deviation from upstream _now_, it
doesn't have to be in the long run.

> thanks for pointing me in the right direction!

Happy to help. :)

Regards,
Christian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: