Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home
Hello,
On 05/04/16 16:28, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
> Ok, nearly there... thanks for the help, still struggling on one
> thing, here is the term log but basically the deb sig doesn't match
> the other two and i'm not sure why. i even tried replacing it:
>
> [10:18:21 main]$ debsigs -sign=origin -default-key="Herb Gilliland
> (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com
> <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>" fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb
>
> You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
> user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com
> <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
> 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05
>
> [10:07:10 main]$ debsign fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes -k"Herb Gilliland
> (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
> signfile fed_0.94a-1.dsc Herb Gilliland (fed author)
> <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>
>
> You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
> user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com
> <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
> 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05
>
> signfile fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes Herb Gilliland (fed author)
> <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>
>
> You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
> user: "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com
> <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
> 2048-bit RSA key, ID DE8473B0, created 2016-04-05
>
> Successfully signed dsc and changes files
At this stage you are done. Looks good. The .debs are not signed but the
signed .dsc file offers the MD5 hash values.
[omitting the debsigs bits]
You tell dput to e.g. upload the .changes files to mentors (or the
ftp-masters for your sponsor) and it will ftp the changes file and all
the other files referenced within with it.
Congratulations!
Steffen
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it <mailto:costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >Having trouble doing the signing. I was able to sign the .deb but not the .changes, any hints? I
> couldn't rectify the situation online yet
>
>
> debsign filename_version.changes
>
> maybe you have to export your key on ~/.devscripts.
>
> e.g. for my key
>
> DEBSIGN_KEYID='92978A6E195E4921825F7FF0F34F09744E9F5DD9'
>
>
> cheers,
>
> G.
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> <locutusofborg@debian.org <mailto:locutusofborg@debian.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Herbert
> >
> >if you want to maintain the package in Debian it would be easier
> to find a sponsor.
> >
> >
> >you might want to start from there
> >https://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging
> >
> >you will probably need to check lintian and check-all-the-things
> to first review your packaging.
> >
> >after that, please upload to mentors.debian.net
> <http://mentors.debian.net> and open an RFS bug
> >
> >cheers,
> >
> >G.
> >
> >
> >
> >Il Sabato 19 Marzo 2016 21:11, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III
> <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>> ha
> scritto:
> >
> >
> >Hi Debian Mentors,
> >
> >I am a long-time user of nano - in fact it replaced my use of
> pico - but in 2011 after I made a request to the nano people and
> that was categorically denied, I decided to make an editor for
> linux using ncurses that was a little more modern and similar to
> editors found on desktop PCs like Windows and Mac. That's how fed
> (fedit) started.
> >
> >It has the feel of nano combined with feel of, say, Notepad++ or
> KomodoEdit.
> >
> >Anyway, I was within 3 or 4 features of what I would call a
> version 1.0, when I hit a roadblock trying to get it into a distro
> and decided to give up for a while. Looking back at all of the
> features I packed into it, I know it deserves a home among the
> other terminal editors like emacs, vi, nano et al. It's really
> _different_ than those editors, and should be able to stand on its
> own. The problem is, not many people know about it or have it as
> a part of their linux experience.
> >
> >I've been using Debian since 1991 and I really would love it to
> be a part of the apt-get package downloading system, officially
> supported! I have some time to devote to this, but not a ton, but
> I want to persevere so I can apt-get nano and also apt-get fed
> >
> >I'm willing to change to license it however it must be, I just
> really want people to experience some of the awesome features of fed
> >
> >fed incorporates some of the greatest features of an ncurses
> editor, but also in a familiar way regarding keystroes, and it has
> a 'perfect amount of features' rather than an absolute ton as its
> core offering. It can be extended through short scripts using a
> plugin interface, in virtually any scripting language, but
> especially PHP, python, perl, shell scripts (so anything really).
> >
> >A video (which covers pretty much EVERYTHING AWESOME about fed
> and its prepackaged PHP plugins) is here:
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsc_NzxK67k
> >
> >
> >And the source is here, if anyone wants to try it out on their box:
> >http://sourceforge.net/projects/fed
> >
> >
> >I'd love to find a sponsor and have fed just an apt-get away on
> any Debian distro (Ubuntu etc) .. at least, that's what i'm trying
> to accomplish.
> >
> >TIA
> >-h3rb
> >
>
>
Reply to: