Bug#818184: RFS: hal-flash/0.3.3-1 [ITP]
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:02:43 +0900 dai@debian.org wrote:
> lintian(1) says:
>
> | Adding overrides for pedantic tags is probably not worth the effort.
Oh, I have overlooked it. Thank you for your feedback.
I'd been just convinced that "I should fix it" at that time.
> BTW, I hesitate to upload this package because of pabs' suggetion.
> We need to build consensus.
Hmm,
1. hal-flash itself is evil, so not acceptable for debian
2. there is no problem hal-flash itself, but not acceptable for debian
because it helps playback of DRM contents
I guess that the concern is derived from 2., is it correct?
If so, something like hal-compat software exists, (it also provides HAL
compatibility layer which is similar to hal-flash, but it does not
refer about flash DRM at all even though mainly used for it) -
does it acceptable for debian or not? I don't know well.
Should I stop ITP process at once?
Reply to: