[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#813850: RFS: amanda/3.3.8-1 -- Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver



On 29/02/16 23:09, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> sorry, this took awfully long.
>
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:09:20PM +0000, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
>> Amanda have release a new upstream version.  My main sponsor is too
>> busy for helping me.  So I am searching for someone that can help
>> sponsor the new release.
> Ok, I can do it.
> Should I use the git repository?
Yes please.

> Just looking through cgit, I can ask you the following things:
>
> * https in Vcs-Git please

Done

> * standards-version to 3.9.7
Done

> * version restriction on tar can go away, and tar being essential:yes
>   the whole dep can go away
Done
> * are you sure the perl dep is needed?  ${perl:Depends} ought to do it
Done
> * guessing you are using git-buildpackage, why didn't you just
>   `gbp import-dsc` to import the NMU?

My changes are older than the NMU.  So I did not tried to import the NMU.

> * please push the tag for the upstream part
Done
> * you have a build-dep on debhelper version >= 9, but you use compat 5.
>   please bump the compat, after checking the differences in debhelper(7)
Done
> * the *.dirs files don't need to list directories for files installed by
>   other dh_* things, so I'm confident at least line 3,4,5 of
>   amanda-server.dirs are useless, haven't looked at the others

The debian/rules relies on cp and install to copy the files into the
directories listed in *.dirs
I don't like, I would prefer the format:
 mkdir $dir && cp $file $dir

What you recomend?

> * I'm not happy with the old style rules file, but guess I can't ask
>   that much in this case, and I can live well with it anyway :)

Thank you.  This package is being tested on my backup server for some
weeks.  I don't want
to make changes that may invalidate my tests.  The version 3.3.9 is all
ready available and I
can change the rules style for amanda 3.3.9.

>
> ↑ that's the kind of things I want to see changed for me to sponsor it.
> If you confirm I should look at the git repository and you're ok with me
> as a sponsor please confirm so (and fix the already reported problems,
> please ;))
>

This is for today.

Tomorrow I will look into "lintian -I --pedantic"

KInd regards
Jose M Calhariz


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: