Bug#846259: RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] -- New Programming Language

To: 846259-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: 846259-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#846259: RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] -- New Programming Language
From: Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:21:12 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1482092472.28465.5.camel@debian.org>
Reply-to: Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>, 846259-quiet@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <CAJTfq-or60C+S0=yc-gYG88SO2UybiM5Kqv_Pd=9MB24bNdqQQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJTfq-or60C+S0=yc-gYG88SO2UybiM5Kqv_Pd=9MB24bNdqQQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hallo juliarl4ng@gmail.com,

I've neither found the ITP nor I found a package to review. 
Additionally there were concerns about the suitabiltity of Julien for
Debian at this stage.

Please read https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers, 
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#ne
wpackage and https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide

(and also https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq)

Until then I will close this bug as there is nothing actionable.

--
tobi

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#846259: marked as done (RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] -- New Programming Language)
Next by Date: Bug#848200: marked as done (RFS: eoconv/1.4-2 )
Previous by thread: Bug#848593: marked as done (RFS: budgie-indicator-applet/0.3-1)
Next by thread: Bug#846259: marked as done (RFS: Juliar/0.0-12 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable] -- New Programming Language)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread