On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Christoph Mathys wrote: > Thanks for the information. Altough I don't agree with "does not work". "Has > a bug that has no impact on the core functionality" is more accurate. Sorry, I didn't think about what commands are affected. > I'll package the new version as soon as I find some time. Do I just update > the RFS-bug with the updated information? Or close the current one and file > a new RFS with the new version? Update the bug and retitle it. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature