On 2016-12-07 16:06+0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > On 2016-12-07 14:13+0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> control: owner -1 ! >> control: tags -1 moreinfo >>>I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go": >> >>>2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176). >> >> I would like to see it sponsored by the maintainer, but here something I'm worried >> about: >> what is the reason for the repack? non-dfsg files? >> if it is just to skip some tests, I really prefer a debian/clean target, and not a repack >> of the whole source tarball. >> diverging from upstream tarballs has a lot of useless complications that should be avoided >> whenever possible >> >> as a general rule I like repacks when: >> 1) non-dfsg files might be left out >> 2) heavy and useless files are kept in the tarball (e.g. binaries, windows files, or prebuilt stuff) >> >> in the other cases, I never found a good reason for a repack. >> >> Other people might disagree, just I found none documentation about the reasons for this repack. >> >> thanks, >> >> G. > > OK, I thought it was best to avoid the tests by adding an import filter than > using debian/clean (but did not found documentation either). "gbp buildpackage" > showed me a warning at the beginning of the build with debian/clean. I'll > revert this. I've uploaded 2.0.2-1 to mentors.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature