Mattia Rizzolo wrote... > Personally, I'd just repack, appending +ds to the upstream version. > I find switching compression scheme just for the sake of repacking, an > ugly hack; I really really prefer to be shipping whatever upstream > provided me, and if I can't/don't want to do so I want that information > to be clearly visible, in this case in the form of a modified version. Thanks, this seems a sound concept. > > [1] In my opinion, every file in the Debian repositories that carries a > > version number should have unique content over all the time. I found > > some histor[ic] .dsc files on snapshot.d.o that violate this idea, but > > I think I should not extend that list. > > you really found such things? > 'cause really a file once stored in the archive really can't change. > At least, as long as that file is known to dak, it can't change, once a > distribution is archived you theoretically could upload the same > filename with different content. See http://snapshot.debian.org/package/file/4.17-5etch2/ :) I guess this could happen since one upload was for debian (presumably stable-proposed-updates), the other one for debian-security. Still I'd recommend not to try this again. Christoph
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature