[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#843378: RFS: budgie-indicator-applet/0.1-1 ITP



Hi Gianfranco,

  I've submitted a revised package - since this required source
changes the version has changed to 0.2

I've changed to debhelper 10 as recommended.

Note however - when testing on sid and ubuntu zesty I still had to use
in the rules dh $@ --with autoreconf

without the clause, the source was not compiled - I just got an empty
deb binary :/

I also had to keep the extra dh_auto_install because the compilation
creates a .la file and this causes a lintian error.

I was a little surprised - the only real difference I saw between
debhelper 9 and 10 was that I didnt need to specify dh-autoreconf in
the control build-depends

BTW - is there a bug in mentors.debian.net because when I look at the
package it says I'm using debhelper 9 and it gives me a lintian error
that I'm missing dh-autoreconf?

I've changed to a text based pgp signature and thus removed the
include/binaries as requested.

Copyright 2+ --> 3 has been corrected.

I'm not sure what you meant by src:ido is RC buggy - libido3-0.1-dev
is an essential package for both mate-indicator-applet and this applet
compilation - same version exists in sid/stretch and ubuntu zesty.

David

On 11 November 2016 at 10:11, Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
>
>
>
>>  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-indicator-applet"
>
>
> here we are:
>
> license seems wrong:
> License: GPL-2+
>
> but every file seems under GPL-3 (this seems to be probably not an issue, just misleading)
>
> question: why can't you use compat level 10?
>
> this will avoid: autoreconf, dh-autoreconf, dh_install (not sure if needed)
> and simplify the whole packaging
> (with compat level 10 autoreconf is automatic, as well as parallel building)
>
> debian/source/include-binaries, please drop, and use a text public key
>
> build fails:
>
> checking for BUDGIE_PLUGIN... yes
> checking for INDICATOR... no
> configure: error: Package requirements (indicator3-0.4 >= 12.10.2
> libido3-0.1 >= 13.10) were not met:
>
> Requested 'indicator3-0.4 >= 12.10.2' but version of libindicator3 is 0.5.0
>
> and src:ido is currently RC buggy, so you have to fix it if you want this one to migrate.
>
> cheers,
>
> G.


Reply to: