* Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> [2016-11-02 20:15 +0100]: > Hi, > > > Reuploaded. > > still not perfect, lets see the debdiff > @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ > +mailfilter (0.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium > + > + * New upstream version > + * Removed 01_remove_workaround_fixed_FTBFS.patch. Upstream reworked > + Makefile respectively. > + * Removed 05-occurred-spellfix.patch. Applied from upstream. > + * debian/control > + - Corrected upstream homepage url. > + > + -- Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de> Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:55:18 +0200 > + > mailfilter (0.8.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Make the build reproducible. Thanks to Reiner Herrmann for the patch > @@ -6,6 +17,7 @@ > > -- Elimar Riesebieter <riesebie@lxtec.de> Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:20:28 +0200 > > + > mailfilter (0.8.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * New upstream version. Fixes a FTBFS (Closes: 812668) > > > added a space in the previous changelog entry Corrected. > > diff -Nru mailfilter-0.8.4/debian/patches/series mailfilter-0.8.6/debian/patches/series > --- mailfilter-0.8.4/debian/patches/series 2016-03-28 14:01:06.000000000 +0200 > +++ mailfilter-0.8.6/debian/patches/series 2016-10-23 17:01:01.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ > -01_remove_workaround_fixed_FTBFS.patch > 02_fix_build_newer_g++.patch > 03_fix_invalid_conversion.patch > 04_mailfilterex.5-spellfix.patch > -05-occurred-spellfix.patch > > actually you didn't rm them, just from series file :) > (not a real issue) Files removed > >> I'm also worried about such licenses: > >> ./src/rcparser.cc: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or > > > >This file is availabe after build but instructed from > >./src/rcparser.hh > > > >> ./src/rcparser.hh: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or > >> ./src/rfc822parser.cc: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or > >> ./src/rfc822parser.hh: the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or > > > >Those 3(4) files are cloned from bison. So they have all the bison > >license. Neither Andreas nor me can change that. But it should be > >confirm to the DFSG... > > why can't you just use bison then? > https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies is something that should be kept in mind Hmm, I didn't found the respective files in other source packages. Those filenames are not known to apt-file yet. They are introduced by mailfilter 0.8.6. So is there anything else I can do? > > and BTW, I don't care about you changing the license (this is unfeasible), but rather > documenting and adding it to debian/copyright. > > every copyright in the source tarball has to be listed there, regardless of it being used or not. Mentioned the files in d/copyright, Added a note to d/changelog and dputed. Many thanks for sponsoring Elimar -- Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it complex and wonderful ;-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature