Bug#833105: marked as done (RFS: vim-lastplace/3.0.2-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:02:41 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1090724302.14877341.1470175361905.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#833105: RFS: vim-lastplace/3.0.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #833105,
regarding RFS: vim-lastplace/3.0.2-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
833105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833105
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vim-lastplace"
* Package name : vim-lastplace
Version : 3.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Greg Dietsche
* URL : https://github.com/dietsche/vim-lastplace
* License : MIT
Section : editors
It builds those binary packages:
vim-lastplace - Vim script to reopen files at your last edit position
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/vim-lastplace
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vim-lastplace/vim-
lastplace_3.0.2-1.dsc
More information about vim-lastplace can be obtained from
https://mentors.debian.net/package/vim-lastplace.
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #825665)
Regards,
David Rabel
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi
>I think I don't understand.
I think that vim-scripts I mentioned is a tarball of scripts on that website,
or something similar, but the next paragraph answers already the question.
>Yes, this also came to my mind and I asked about it on their mailing
>list. James McCoy answered:
>"Individual packages are fine. Given the current state of vim-scripts,
>that's probably better. I've been delaying updating vim-scripts because
>of various problems in vim-addon-manager that I know will be encountered
>if those scripts are updated. I need to get vim-addon-manager fixed
>first." [1]
>
>So, I am not sure. Maybe it is an option to add it to vim-scripts once
>James has reworked vim-addon-manager and vim-scripts.
we can always merge it later when addon-manager and -scripts gets ready.
I personally prefer team maintenance, but it is up to you, please check
from time to time if there are progresses and in case we will try to merge
it into the -scripts package (whenever possible)
In any case, I sponsored the current package in new queue, I tried,
and it worked correctly!
thanks for your contribution to Debian!
Gianfranco
--- End Message ---
Reply to: