On Tuesday 05 July 2016 01:17:39 Jakub Wilk wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>, 2016-07-04, 18:13: > >dget -x > >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-sk/aspell-sk_2 > >.02-0-0.1.dsc > > > >Changes since the last upload: > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > * New upstream release (Closes: #603719). > > debian/copyright says that the package "was downloaded from > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/sk/";, but there is no 2.02-0 at > this location. Official website for aspell-sk is http://www.sk-spell.sk.cx/aspell-sk where is also last version. On gnu.org is not last version and upstream maintainer confirmed it. > BTW, what's the difference between 2.01-2 and 2.02-0? There's no > entry for the latter version in doc/CHANGELOG. :-\ There is small changelog entry at website, that dictionary was updated to Firefox/Thunderbird version. Quick look at diff between those two versions confirm it. Dictionary is updated (new words + some fixes). > Also, the copyright file says that the package is under GPL, whereas > this new version is tri-licensed: LGPLv2.1, GPLv2, MPLv1.1. Ok, I can update debian/copyright file. > > * Use compat level 9 (Closes: #817360). > > Did you need to do any packaging changes to bump compat? Depends on debhelper 9, no other changes were needed, package built fine and is working. > > * Add Homepage and update Standards-Version. > > Why are these two in a single item? They seem unrelated to me. Those were changes in (one) control file, so I added them to one line. > Did you need to do any packaging changes to update S-V? > I wouldn't recommend updating S-V in an NMU. Well, Debian has in archives very old (maybe prehistoric) version of aspell-sk package. I reported this problem in bug 603719 in past *six* years ago and everybody in Debian ignored it, current maintainer too. And now when I saw that aspell-sk package is going to be removed from Debian, I updated compat level and thought that bringing new version should be done too... > Addition of debian/watch is not documented in the changelog. I can add it. > You changed source format to "3.0 (quilt)", but this change is not > documented either. Also, changing source format is not suitable for > an NMU, unless you have a very good reason. I thought that "3.0 (quilt)" format is preferred for new packages, so I updated it when I touched aspell-sk package. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@gmail.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.