[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#818227: marked as done (RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation for the JVM)

Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:43:01 +0200
with message-id <5777FD25.9020606@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#818227: RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation for the JVM
has caused the Debian Bug report #818227,
regarding RFS: kawa/2.1-1 [ITP] -- Scheme implementation for the JVM
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
818227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist


  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kawa"

 * Package name    : kawa
   Version         : 2.1-1
   Upstream Author : Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
 * URL             : http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/
 * License         : MIT/X
   Section         : lisp

  It builds those binary packages:

    kawa  - general-purpose programming language that runs on the Java platform

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kawa


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kawa/kawa_2.1-1.dsc

  More information about kawa can be obtained from http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/

  
  I removed the documentation files from the upstream tarball, because lintian
  recognised them as non-free. After reading [1] and [2] I thought that was a good 
  idea. I plan to submit the doc files later as a separate non-free package.

  [1] https://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
  [2] https://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeFilesInOrigSources

  Regards,
   Andrea Bernardini

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
ENOANSWER in three months

Closing

G.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: