Your message dated Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:04:29 +0000 (UTC) with message-id <376828262.1366648.1467479069949.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#828166: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #828166, regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 828166: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828166 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]
- From: Felix Krull <f_krull@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:21:37 +0000
- Message-id: <CABrj8FzukuiwxHOWagabyKV67yrrZKeuk+w8KA8OV6UH10d87g@mail.gmail.com>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "speedcrunch"
* Package name : speedcrunch
Version : 0.11-1
Upstream Author : Helder Correia & others
* URL : http://speedcrunch.org
* License : GPL-2+
Section : math
It builds those binary packages:
speedcrunch - High precision calculator
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/speedcrunch
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/speedcrunch/speedcrunch_0.11-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* New maintainer (closes: #826923).
* New upstream release (closes: #771440).
* debian/docs: update for new readme file.
* debian/patches: remove outdated patches.
* debian/speedcrunch.desktop: remove desktop file, upstream now includes one.
* debian/control: Standards-Version, Vcs-*, update build dependencies.
* debian/install: PNG icon is now installed by upstream build process.
* debian/rules: adapt to changes in build system, make better use of dh features, use Debian build flags.
* debian/menu: remove.
* debian/watch: update.
* Import .desktop file keywords from upstream (LP: #994190).
Regards,
Felix Krull
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Felix Krull <f_krull@gmx.de>, <828166-done@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#828166: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]
- From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:04:29 +0000 (UTC)
- Message-id: <376828262.1366648.1467479069949.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CABrj8FxHkPXnKaDvMCHfh+ri3fBCuknDe9-Nj7eVz7FhXtafag@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CABrj8FzukuiwxHOWagabyKV67yrrZKeuk+w8KA8OV6UH10d87g@mail.gmail.com> <87oa6opn9o.fsf@sergiodj.net> <1599135813.3606996.1467033779149.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] CABrj8FxHkPXnKaDvMCHfh+ri3fBCuknDe9-Nj7eVz7FhXtafag@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Felix, >Thanks for the reviews! thanks to you for maintaining this package >I'm not sure what you mean by that? But I extended the changelog somewhat. https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ it is fine now :) >I must say I'm a bit confused about how the Developer Reference suggests to "concentrate on describing significant and user-visible changes," but the informal >advice I've heard on changelog entries was always to be very detailed and granular, which to me seems more like a job for VCS history than a changelog. I prefer the "better safe then sorry approach", but you are somewhat right :) >That was backported from upstream, so not necessary. I added an Origin header field to the patch to make that explicit (also changed to a more concise file name). wonderful >Originally, "why not" :) But forcing CMake prevents dh from picking up the .pro file in the same directory and using qmake. "--builddirectory" was, indeed, >unnecessary. wonderful. not sure why do you prefer cmake over qmake, but I admit I prefer it too :) (I find it more powerful than qmake, even if I really like them both) >Good point, I changed it. thanks >(I'm assuming that uploading a new package with the same version is an acceptable way to use mentors.d.n, mostly because it didn't stop me.) exactly, on its way for unstable G.
--- End Message ---