[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#825904: RFS: python-model-mommy/1.2.6-1



control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 moreinfo

Hi, looking at requirements.txt, seems that six is used

grep six . -R |grep import
./model_mommy/utils.py:from six import string_types
./model_mommy/generators.py:import six
./model_mommy/recipe.py:from six import string_types
./model_mommy/mommy.py:from six import string_types, advance_iterator, PY3


adding it to build-dependencies should automatically make it a dependency thanks
to dh_python2...

Do you think it should be added or not?

also django is needed?

please let me know

Oh and BTW I would appreciate a "Team Upload" in changelog :)

cheers,

G.




Il Martedì 31 Maggio 2016 10:57, Edward Betts <edward@4angle.com> ha scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-model-mommy"

* Package name    : python-model-mommy
   Version         : 1.2.6-1
   Upstream Author : vandersonmota <vandersonmota@gmail.com>
* URL             : http://github.com/vandersonmota/model_mommy
* License         : Apache-2.0
   Section         : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-taskw - Python bindings for your taskwarrior database
  python3-taskw - Python bindings for your taskwarrior database (Python 3 version)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-model-mommy

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
  https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-model-mommy/python-model-mommy_1.2.6-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * Team upload.

  [ Edward Betts ]
  * New upstream release. (Closes: #745093, #755657, #814781)
  * Build Python 3 package.
  * Fix lintian warning: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique
  * Update Standards-Version to 3.9.8 (no changes)
  * Update to debhelper 9

  [ Ondřej Nový ]
  * Fixed VCS URL (https)


Reply to: