Hello, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:55:07PM +0200, Jose Luis Blanco wrote: > > Based on your description, it sounds like the -g packages might be > > useful for someone. The only question is what you should call the > > binary package. Are you saying that those packages already exist in > > Debian for wxWidgets? What is the binary package name in that case? > > Here is the only example I know in Debian (may be other packages like this?) > > https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libwxgtk2.8-dbg > And the rest of wx*-dbg packages: > https://packages.debian.org/source/wheezy/wxwidgets2.8 The most recent version of libwxgtk*-dbg in Debian is just detached debugging symbols i.e. the same as the *-dbgsym. The "-b extra runtime checks" package has been dropped: see #655251. I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect -dbg to be detached debugging symbols. You could write to debian-devel@lists.debian.org and/or debian-mentors@lists.debian.org to see if anyone is aware of a precedent; I'm afraid I don't know of one. > I tried to replicate your error under Debian sid amd64 without luck. I > tried with and without ccache (I noticed you use it and thought it may > be the problem). > > So, you want to give it another try after updating everything to "sid" > it would be great, but I can't offer any fix because it seems to build > clean in my local env, and in many other automated build farms > (travis-ci, Ubuntu PPA, etc.) It was already updated to sid :( Could you confirm that it succeeds for you on a 32-bit machine, please? I don't have access to a 64-bit machine for testing. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature