[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#810853: RFS: moosefs/2.0.83-1 [ITP] -- fault tolerant, reliable, highly available, highly performing, scaling-out network distributed file system



On Monday, 23 May 2016 9:08:20 AM AEST Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Did anything happened here in the past 4+ months?

Not much from packaging prospective. Upstream however show some signs of 
improvement as they've started using GitHub:

  https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs


> Dmitry setted the moreinfo tag (as this indeed need(ed) work), but I
> anyway can't understand if he is an available sponsor for this.

I'm still busy so I can't make any promises regarding sponsorship.
However I am probably the best person to review packaging... As far as I'm 
aware they've never attempted to improve packaging so I doubt they can 
maintain it properly...
Last time I checked upstream packaging was too sloppy for upload.

I still have some concerns regarding inferior licensing [1] and I believe  
that MooseFS is redundant when we already have LizardFS.
I'm not against having alternative storage system which may have benefits 
like availability of different MySQL/MariaDB flavours...

[1]: https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs/issues/5

-- 
Cheers,
 Dmitry Smirnov.

---

Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything
else is public relations.
        -- George Orwell

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: