Bug#819395: RFS: stormlib-listfiles/2015-04-20-1 [ITP]
On Friday 15 April 2016 16:29:24 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> some questisons:
> std-version
> section extra? maybe optional?
I have no opinion about section. So change it to optional?
> why this package is not depending on anything else?
Because this package contains just text files, needed to build reverse
hash table with file names for old mpq archives. There is no need to
depend on something.
But package smpq depends on this package. It uses stormlib read those
files and send content to smpq library for file name support.
> why exclude WOW?
Because it is not needed. See http://zezula.net/en/mpq/namebreak.html
all WOW internal list files are complete.
> license of debian packaging is stricter than the upstream one,
> you might not be able to forward patches without relicensing.
So what do you suggest? What is common in this such case?
> are you sure there isn't any trademark violations there?
I'm not lawyer.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
Reply to: