[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home



Index of /

NameSizeDate Modified
dislocker-dbgsym_0.6.1-1_amd64.deb20.1 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM
dislocker_0.6.1-1.debian.tar.xz7.4 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM
dislocker_0.6.1-1.dsc2.0 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM
dislocker_0.6.1-1_amd64.deb18.5 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM
dislocker_0.6.1.orig.tar.gz97.5 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM
fed_0.95a-1.debian.tar.gz648 B4/9/16, 11:59:00 PM
fed_0.95a-1.dsc1.3 kB4/9/16, 11:59:00 PM
fed_0.95a-1_source.changes1.6 kB4/9/16, 11:59:00 PM
fed_0.95a.orig.tar.gz249 kB4/9/16, 11:59:00 PM
libdislocker0-dev_0.6.1-1_amd64.deb18.3 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM
libdislocker0.6-dbgsym_0.6.1-1_amd64.deb82.2 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM
libdislocker0.6_0.6.1-1_amd64.deb36.1 kB4/9/16, 9:21:00 PM

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok I bumped the version by .01 and re-uploaded now that my key is in keys.gnupg.net

Said it was uploaded successfuly, but still doesn't appear

Is it because my GPG email is not exactly like my mentors account?  Otherwise, I feel like I've got everything set up with gpg.. sorry this is such a headache.  Why not let ppl upload via nifty HTML form?  Meh anyway...

Maybe it will show up soon.. :(


On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> wrote:
[19:50:36 main]$ gpg --search-keys DE8473B0
gpg: searching for "DE8473B0" from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
(1)     Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com>
          2048 bit RSA key 76860CC4ADB94766DAAD5EB6AA74DF0CDE8473B0, created: 2016-04-05
Keys 1-1 of 1 for "DE8473B0".  Enter number(s), N)ext, or Q)uit >

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> wrote:

[19:33:00 main]$ gpg --send-keys DE8473B0
gpg: sending key DE8473B0 to hkp server keys.gnupg.net

[19:38:31 main]$ gpg --refresh-keys
gpg: refreshing 1 key from hkp://keys.gnupg.net
gpg: requesting key DE8473B0 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpgkeys: key 76860CC4ADB94766DAAD5EB6AA74DF0CDE8473B0 not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok I sent the gpg key to the keys.gnupg.net server

Now what? 

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> wrote:
I see that "roadfighter' uploaded correctly.  Any hints on what i'm doing wrong for "fed"?

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> wrote:
Change GPG key
Current GPG key:2048R/DE8473B0
Delete current key:
GPG key:
Please use the output of gpg ...

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
strange, I did look at ftp://mentors.debian.net/ and I didn't see them
(they disappear once accepted)


maybe you can double check your gpg key here
https://mentors.debian.net/my

gpg --recv-keys DE8473B0
gpg: requesting key DE8473B0 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpgkeys: key DE8473B0 not found on keyserver
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0


seems that your key isn't on global keyservers, check at least it is on
mentors.

G.

Il Giovedì 7 Aprile 2016 8:35, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> ha scritto:



G,

I wasn't able to use that dput.cf, but I did use your dpkg-* info .. I will see if this time using Steffen's upload method worked.

log:

[02:33:54 main]$ dput mentors-ftp fed_0.94a-1_source.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: Signature made Thu Apr  7 02:32:10 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0
gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com>"
Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_source.changes.
Checking signature on .dsc
gpg: Signature made Thu Apr  7 02:32:07 2016 EDT using RSA key ID DE8473B0
gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author) <herb.gilliland@gmail.com>"
Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1.dsc.
Uploading to mentors-ftp (via ftp to mentors.debian.net):
  Uploading fed_0.94a-1.dsc: done.
  Uploading fed_0.94a.orig.tar.gz: done.
  Uploading fed_0.94a-1.debian.tar.gz: done.
  Uploading fed_0.94a-1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.


On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:

I usually do
>dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa
>
>dput mentors ../packagename_version_source.changes
>
>this should work.
>
>my ~/.dput.cf
>[mentors]
>method                  = ftp
>fqdn                    = mentors.debian.net
>incoming                = .
>login                   = anonymous
>
>
>I use dput-ng, and I have my public key on mentors, under my account.
>
>
>(well, I don't use mentors anymore, but I used to)
>
>G.
>
>
>
>Il Giovedì 7 Aprile 2016 6:32, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>Well, it's not large.. um, yeah no dice still no packages appearing under "my packages"
>
>
>On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>Sounds large ;)
>>
>>Thumbs pressed.
>>
>>Steffen
>>
>>
>>On 07/04/16 02:32, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
>>> I guess AFAIK from FAQ
>>>
>>>
>>>       How long will it take until my upload is available to sponsors?
>>>
>>> If you upload via FTP, which you must do if a package is too large for
>>> the HTTP uploader, then there can be up to a 30 minute delay before
>>> your package gets processed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III
>>> <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Steffen,
>>>
>>>     Thanks.  One discrepancy was that I was attempting HTTP before,
>>>     though I did switch to ftp ... regardless, following your
>>>     instructions, I was able to FTP properly!
>>>
>>>     However, after uploading, my package did not appear under "my
>>>     packages" at mentors.debian.net <http://mentors.debian.net> -- is
>>>     this not instantaneous, or does it take some amount of time longer
>>>     than a few minutes?
>>>
>>>     My name on mentors:  Herbert Elwood Gilliland III
>>>     My name in signage:  Herb Gilliland
>>>
>>>     Email is identical, though.
>>>
>>>     Doesn't appear on mentors.debian.net <http://mentors.debian.net>
>>>     either for today.. but maybe I'm just expecting it too soon?
>>>
>>>     -h
>>>
>>>     p.s. log:
>>>
>>>     [20:25:16 main]$ dput mentors-ftp fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes
>>>     Checking signature on .changes
>>>     gpg: Signature made Wed Apr  6 20:24:49 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
>>>     DE8473B0
>>>     gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>>     <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
>>>     Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes.
>>>     Checking signature on .dsc
>>>     gpg: Signature made Wed Apr  6 20:24:46 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
>>>     DE8473B0
>>>     gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>>     <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
>>>     Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1.dsc.
>>>     Uploading to mentors-ftp (via ftp to mentors.debian.net
>>>     <http://mentors.debian.net>):
>>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1.dsc: done.
>>>       Uploading fed_0.94a.orig.tar.gz: done.
>>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1.debian.tar.gz: done.
>>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb: done.
>>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes: done.
>>>     Successfully uploaded packages.
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Steffen Möller
>>>     <steffen_moeller@gmx.de <mailto:steffen_moeller@gmx.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On 07/04/16 01:12, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
>>>         > Thanks all.. except:
>>>         >
>>>         >
>>>         > [19:11:24 main]$ dput -f mentors fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes
>>>         > Checking signature on .changes
>>>         > gpg: Signature made Tue Apr  5 10:07:24 2016 EDT using RSA
>>>         key ID DE8473B0
>>>         > gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>>         > <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>
>>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com
>>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>>"
>>>         > Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes.
>>>         > Checking signature on .dsc
>>>         > gpg: Signature made Tue Apr  5 10:07:20 2016 EDT using RSA
>>>         key ID DE8473B0
>>>         > gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>>         > <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>
>>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com
>>
>>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>>"
>>>         > Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1.dsc.
>>>         > Checksum doesn't match for /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb
>>>         >
>>>         >
>>>         > Is this " done "?
>>>         >
>>>         Admittedly - not so. Your previous email has shown that you
>>>         already know
>>>         much more about it all than  )you need to know to produce a
>>>         working
>>>         package. It must be something ... weird.  I expect you to
>>>         experience
>>>         what you experienced if you once ran everything successfully
>>>         and then
>>>         decided to run "fakeroot ./debian/rules binary" again or so,
>>>         such that
>>>         debs and the changes are no longer in sync.
>>>
>>>         If you do not mind too much, please remove all the debs of
>>>         yours and the
>>>         changes and dsc files, i.e. only leave the source tree with
>>>         the debian
>>>         folder and you orig.tar.xz (gz, bz2, whatever) file and
>>>         rebuild the
>>>         package.
>>>
>>>         To build, I use
>>>         dpkg-buildpackge -rfakeroot -uc -us
>>>         from within the source tree and the compressed tarball in .. .
>>>
>>>         You then find the newly created .changes and .dsc and .debs in
>>>         .., too.
>>>
>>>         I then typically
>>>         cd..
>>>         and
>>>         debsign -kMYK3YID *.changes
>>>
>>>         This -k option to debsign is helpful for sponsoring, i.e. when the
>>>         maintainer is not the one signing for the upload. It also helps to
>>>         disambiguate should you have multiple keys matching your email
>>>         address,
>>>         so I was mentioning it here.
>>>
>>>         And dput should just work, then. Send me (or Gianfranco) a
>>>         reference to
>>>         your packaging work if not. Sponsoring implies to rebuild, anyway.
>>>
>>>         Good luck!
>>>
>>>         Steffen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>








Reply to: