[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fed (fedit) seeking a linux home



I usually do
dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa 

dput mentors ../packagename_version_source.changes

this should work.

my ~/.dput.cf
[mentors]
method                  = ftp
fqdn                    = mentors.debian.net
incoming                = .
login                   = anonymous


I use dput-ng, and I have my public key on mentors, under my account.


(well, I don't use mentors anymore, but I used to)

G.


Il Giovedì 7 Aprile 2016 6:32, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III <herb.gilliland@gmail.com> ha scritto:



Well, it's not large.. um, yeah no dice still no packages appearing under "my packages"


On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de> wrote:

Sounds large ;)
>
>Thumbs pressed.
>
>Steffen
>
>
>On 07/04/16 02:32, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
>> I guess AFAIK from FAQ
>>
>>
>>       How long will it take until my upload is available to sponsors?
>>
>> If you upload via FTP, which you must do if a package is too large for
>> the HTTP uploader, then there can be up to a 30 minute delay before
>> your package gets processed.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III
>> <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Steffen,
>>
>>     Thanks.  One discrepancy was that I was attempting HTTP before,
>>     though I did switch to ftp ... regardless, following your
>>     instructions, I was able to FTP properly!
>>
>>     However, after uploading, my package did not appear under "my
>>     packages" at mentors.debian.net <http://mentors.debian.net> -- is
>>     this not instantaneous, or does it take some amount of time longer
>>     than a few minutes?
>>
>>     My name on mentors:  Herbert Elwood Gilliland III
>>     My name in signage:  Herb Gilliland
>>
>>     Email is identical, though.
>>
>>     Doesn't appear on mentors.debian.net <http://mentors.debian.net>
>>     either for today.. but maybe I'm just expecting it too soon?
>>
>>     -h
>>
>>     p.s. log:
>>
>>     [20:25:16 main]$ dput mentors-ftp fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes
>>     Checking signature on .changes
>>     gpg: Signature made Wed Apr  6 20:24:49 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
>>     DE8473B0
>>     gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>     <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
>>     Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes.
>>     Checking signature on .dsc
>>     gpg: Signature made Wed Apr  6 20:24:46 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
>>     DE8473B0
>>     gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>     <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>"
>>     Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1.dsc.
>>     Uploading to mentors-ftp (via ftp to mentors.debian.net
>>     <http://mentors.debian.net>):
>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1.dsc: done.
>>       Uploading fed_0.94a.orig.tar.gz: done.
>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1.debian.tar.gz: done.
>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb: done.
>>       Uploading fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes: done.
>>     Successfully uploaded packages.
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Steffen Möller
>>     <steffen_moeller@gmx.de <mailto:steffen_moeller@gmx.de>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 07/04/16 01:12, Herbert Elwood Gilliland III wrote:
>>         > Thanks all.. except:
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > [19:11:24 main]$ dput -f mentors fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes
>>         > Checking signature on .changes
>>         > gpg: Signature made Tue Apr  5 10:07:24 2016 EDT using RSA
>>         key ID DE8473B0
>>         > gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>         > <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>>"
>>         > Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.changes.
>>         > Checking signature on .dsc
>>         > gpg: Signature made Tue Apr  5 10:07:20 2016 EDT using RSA
>>         key ID DE8473B0
>>         > gpg: Good signature from "Herb Gilliland (fed author)
>>         > <herb.gilliland@gmail.com <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com
>
>>         <mailto:herb.gilliland@gmail.com>>>"
>>         > Good signature on /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1.dsc.
>>         > Checksum doesn't match for /home/main/temp/fed_0.94a-1_i386.deb
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > Is this " done "?
>>         >
>>         Admittedly - not so. Your previous email has shown that you
>>         already know
>>         much more about it all than  )you need to know to produce a
>>         working
>>         package. It must be something ... weird.  I expect you to
>>         experience
>>         what you experienced if you once ran everything successfully
>>         and then
>>         decided to run "fakeroot ./debian/rules binary" again or so,
>>         such that
>>         debs and the changes are no longer in sync.
>>
>>         If you do not mind too much, please remove all the debs of
>>         yours and the
>>         changes and dsc files, i.e. only leave the source tree with
>>         the debian
>>         folder and you orig.tar.xz (gz, bz2, whatever) file and
>>         rebuild the
>>         package.
>>
>>         To build, I use
>>         dpkg-buildpackge -rfakeroot -uc -us
>>         from within the source tree and the compressed tarball in .. .
>>
>>         You then find the newly created .changes and .dsc and .debs in
>>         .., too.
>>
>>         I then typically
>>         cd..
>>         and
>>         debsign -kMYK3YID *.changes
>>
>>         This -k option to debsign is helpful for sponsoring, i.e. when the
>>         maintainer is not the one signing for the upload. It also helps to
>>         disambiguate should you have multiple keys matching your email
>>         address,
>>         so I was mentioning it here.
>>
>>         And dput should just work, then. Send me (or Gianfranco) a
>>         reference to
>>         your packaging work if not. Sponsoring implies to rebuild, anyway.
>>
>>         Good luck!
>>
>>         Steffen
>>
>>
>>
>
>


Reply to: