[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#814806: marked as done (RFS: libauxv/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- libauxv -- Auxiliary Vector Library library)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:56:00 +0200
with message-id <20160404165600.GB29019@kin.test.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#814806: RFS: libauxv/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- libauxv -- Auxiliary Vector Library library
has caused the Debian Bug report #814806,
regarding RFS: libauxv/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- libauxv -- Auxiliary Vector Library library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libauxv"

 Package name    : libauxv
 Version         : 1.1.0-1
 Upstream Author : Libauxv team
 URL             : https://github.com/Libauxv/libauxv
 License         : New-BSD-License
 Section         : devel

It builds those binary packages:

  libauxv-dev - Auxiliary Vector Library development files
  libauxv1   - Auxiliary Vector Library
  lsauxv     - Auxiliary Vector Tool

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libauxv


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/liba/libauxv/libauxv_1.1.0-1.dsc

More information about libauxv can be obtained from https://github.com/Libauxv/libauxv

Note:
This library has only been tested on POWER architecture but upstream
says : "The maintainer will accept patches for other architectures.
The principle should work for other architectures and platforms."

Regards,
 Frederic Bonnard

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Gianfranco,

> so, do you think we can close this RFS?
> I don't think the package is still useful after the latest commends.

absolutely; I forgot to close the bug :)

F.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: