Bug#818735: RFS: qwtplot3d/0.2.7+svn191-10

["Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <gudjon@gudjon.org>]

Hi Mattia
> 
> * you're using any-amd64 and any-i386, then why do you explicitly list
>   hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 too?
Ok. I will remove these.
> * you're changing only one binary, what about the others?  from what I'm
>   seeing the failure is in the configure step which is done by all
>   binaries, so this change wouldn't fix the FTBFS)
A mistake. But can I exclude arm only for the qt5 libraries? The qt5 libraries have never been in
testing so I guess it may be easier.
Do you know of any package where only the a part is built for all architectures?
> * why are you not closing the bug?
Because it isn't solved. I would prefer to port the code to use GL that works on arm but
until that is done I will exclude arm.
I will reduce the bugs severity as soon as version -10 is uploaded.
> * do you know that to allow the testing migration you'd still need to
>   remove the binaries from unstable by filing a bug against
>   ftp.debian.org?  actually that would be enough, even without
>   restricting the architecures where you build, then you can leave the
>   packages in FTBFS state there until it could build again.
Sorry, I didn't know but that sounds reasonable.
But if I keep the qt4 binaries in but only restrict the qt5 binaries. Do I then still need to file a bug?

Regards
Gudjon