[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#816169: RFS: fake-factory/0.5.3-1



On 19/03/16 18:02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 05:34:20PM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> On 19/03/16 14:11, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> I began packaging this before my application to join the team was
>> approved, and when this happened and I pushed the package to the
>> repository, I forgot to add the related metadata in to the control file.
> 
> I see :)
> 
> though, Vcs-Git is wrong:
> +Vcs-Git:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/python-modules/packages/fake-factory.git
> that's 404, you need a /git/ in the middle.
> 
> 
>>> Another thing: please build the manpage at build time, by calling
>>> help2man directly there.
>>
>> Thanks for your review. I have now fixed most of the issues you have
>> highlighted. The manpage still needs a bit of work, the help output
>> contains some long lines, and I think this is causing a lintian warning
>> (but I'm not sure how to fix this?).
> 
> another thing is that you need to remove the built manpage in the clean
> target (e.g. add it to debian/clean)
> 
> and please entirely remove debian/gbp.conf, no point in keeping it as a
> 0-byte file ;)
>
> 
>> The other issue that has arisen since making this sponsorship request,
>> is that the upstream maintainers have announced that the project is
>> changing name in September (fake-factory -> faker). This is good, but it
>> means that the Debian source package and binary packages should also
>> make this change. I am not sure of the process around changing source
>> package name, but I guess the two options would be to upload, change
>> name upload in September, or just wait until September before uploading
>> this package?
> 
> well, yes, those are the two options.
> Another option is to already change the name now in Debian only.

I think I realised when I read this, that the source and binary package
names can be handled separately, so I have gone ahead and renamed the
source package to faker [1]. I'll delete the other (fake-factory)
repository and try to update the BTS tomorrow, if I hear no objections.

The issues that you commented on above are fixed in this repository.

1: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/faker.git

> I wonder why upstream is taking a so long timeframe to renme the
> project...

I think the timeframe relates to the name being used by another project,
and taking over the use of this name on the PyPI.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: