control: block 544012 by -1
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:18:58PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdk-doc-non-dfsg"; it is
> > the non-DFSG documentation (GNU Free Documentation License with invariant
> > front and back covers) for mdk, the MIX Development Kit.
> >
> > * Package name : mdk-doc-non-dfsg
Is there a good reason to have such a name for the source package?
What was wrong with just "mdk-doc" ?
> > Note that I'm aware that Lintian produces a single pedantic message about
> > the watch file checking the upstream PGP signature; well, the watch file
> > actually does that, but it uses a line continuation syntax that Lintian
> > does not yet understand; I intend to file a bug about that, hopefully along
> > with a patch, soon.
well, to fix that tag is enough to remove the whitespaces.
Anyway, yes please file that bug.
> > dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/m/mdk-doc-non-dfsg/mdk-doc-non-dfsg_1.2.9-1.dsc
>
> OK, I've uploaded a new version of mdk-doc-non-dfsg to mentors.d.n at
> the same location with a single major change: declare compliancy with
> Debian Policy 3.9.7 and, thus, install the documentation into
> /usr/share/doc/mdk/ instead of /usr/share/doc/mdk-doc/ as suggested by
> the brand new policy's section 12.3.
cool.
I find the package ok, apart from its name. I find no sense whatsoever
to have '-non-dfsg' in the source package name, the section is enough.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature