Bug#816266: RE:Bug#816266: RFS: python-qtawesome/0.3.0-1 [ITP]
> I don't know enough about the python-qtawesome package to tell whether
> python-xstatic-font-awesome is equivalent functionality-wise.
Me too :)
> I don't expect it to be an easy pitch to ask the Spyder team to
> rethink their dependency chain just for the sake of re-usability.
> Unless you had a different reason in mind?
No thi si sjuste that I do not want duplication in the Debina archive.
so maybe this qtaesome code is almost equivalent to the python-xstatic-font-aweosme.
I need to investigate :)
> Besides, what about the elusive fonts?
I am on it And I think that it will be an easy task :)
I already asked to become part of the pkg-fonts team today :)
Cheers
Fred
> FYI, I have upgraded the packaging with the latest upstream version
> (0.3.1). Shall I upload it to mentors?
If you want :)
Cheers
Fred
Reply to: