Bug#796894: marked as done (RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA])
Your message dated Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:30:33 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <403413018.257729.1440516633797.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #796894,
regarding RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
796894: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796894
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm looking for an uploader for my new package of American Fuzzy Lop (afl), which
is on ITA [1].
The package is Git-ized here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/afl.git
Build log:
http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/afl_1.86b-1_amd64-20150825-1547.build
Mentors upload:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/afl/afl_1.86b-1.dsc
Due to problems with clang-3.5 on arm64 [2] I've disabled the build for this arch
temporarily, as Jakub suggested to do. Gianfranco has found out that the package
builds again fine with >= clang-3.7. When this is in I want to prepare a -2 for
experimental patched for llvm-toolchain-3.7 for those really need this on arm64.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/786806
ITA: afl -- instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/796343
clang-3.5: [arm64] segfault in 'Greedy Register Allocator'
--
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
4096R/DF5182C8
46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>Well, sorry for missing those. I already did the upload.
not a problem for me :), just a question, Daniel, would you at least fix
them on git, to avoid forgetting about them in a future release?
BTW you will need to likely ask an RM for arm64 to let the package migrate
to testing (modulo gcc transition).
cheers,
G
--- End Message ---
Reply to: