Hi there,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 at 22:21:21 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> In general, I'd find sponsoring this NMU much easier if the package
> split and the fixing of those many bugs could happen in separate
> uploads. Each part is complex and the fallout is hard to estimate. I
> understand that such a separation would mean more work for you. Do you
> think that doing this in two steps is worth the added effort?
Alright, would it help moving forward if I were doing that? Reverting
to 2014.65 is easy, and the current 2015.68-1 could always be uploaded
once 2014.65-1 has entered testing. It'd be quite sad to upload known
bugs in a package containing multiple lintian warnings and errors [0],
but if someone is willing to review and upload the package, but only
with the split of dropbear-{bin,run,initramfs} and without the many
extra bug fixes, then I'm ready to clean, test and release [1].
Cheers,
--
Guilhem.
[0] https://lintian.debian.org/full/pape@smarden.org.html#dropbear_2014.65-1
[1] https://gitweb.guilhem.org/dropbear?p=dropbear;a=commit;h=64ea640134b67e68daad2096d54afc91b0722895
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature